m@thias.hellqui.st :verified-skull: on Nostr: Mmm…you say “can”. I’m thinking we should consider if it “should”. I ...
Mmm…you say “can”. I’m thinking we should consider if it “should”. I predict a *lot* of spammy broadcasting posts otherwise. People can obviously sift by chosing not to follow those accounts but…
It would make sense to be able to control the audience of a post, that indeed seems to be a requested feature, but personally I fail to see why I should be able to broadcast to “everyone” and then just pick a handful of people who can interact with my post.
The other way around, I am thinking if I limit who can interact with my post, it should **also** *only* be delivered to those people. It kind of “comes with the deal”. It also sounds rather fair (which obviously will be the main reason to why it’ll never happen).
To me, the general rule would be: “if you can read it you can interact with it”.
But that is me. 😄
Terence Eden’s Blog (npub1y66…eusx)
It would make sense to be able to control the audience of a post, that indeed seems to be a requested feature, but personally I fail to see why I should be able to broadcast to “everyone” and then just pick a handful of people who can interact with my post.
The other way around, I am thinking if I limit who can interact with my post, it should **also** *only* be delivered to those people. It kind of “comes with the deal”. It also sounds rather fair (which obviously will be the main reason to why it’ll never happen).
To me, the general rule would be: “if you can read it you can interact with it”.
But that is me. 😄
Terence Eden’s Blog (npub1y66…eusx)