Bondless on Nostr: ""There is no one" vs. "I know that there is no one". That there is nobody, nobody ...
""There is no one" vs. "I know that there is no one".
That there is nobody, nobody knows. This sounds more than paradoxical to the ears of the supposed person...actually crazy.
Simply because it consists of this supposed knowledge.
The only thing she knows is living in concepts.
Therefore, of course, when it is said, "There is No One", the "translation" into the only thing she knows, namely a concept, automatically takes place.
But there is simply no one, who prays that here, MUST pray that here.
Just THAT one would be exactly the one, which has never existed. This impression to be somebody who inhabits these bodies and can cause things with power of decision out of himself is illusion. That is the suggestion :-)
No dogma.
No truth.
No anything.
No need to convince. Who then?
Who is there now that is missing something?
It's just obvious when it's obvious.
And then it is clear that no one needs to be taught anything or can be taught anything.
What can happen then, out of this clarity, is that either it is reported or it is not.
And both are equally the same thing.
There is no choice in it. That is also clear.
But what definitely no longer appears is the need for a change of what is.
That would be the "privilege" of that energy which has the impression to be ME.
And this again is neither wrong nor right, but likewise that what appears by itself or just no more.
So here is not the statement that the I must go away. Or that something is wrong.
Here is the statement, it can never be different than it is, by itself.
In it, however, it would be obvious that this ominous I never existed.
Because I is hope and the need linked with it on a better experience ( for myself).
What can happen, for no reason and for no purpose and without any condition, is that this obviousness indiscriminately and undeniably comes to light and thus reveals the timeless absence of that supposed instance (I).
What is then clear is that nothing has fallen away there and in reality nothing has changed, but that this I never and nowhere existed.
However, this remains just not as a concept of clarity.
What remains is completeness, because there is no more experience of being the center in everything.
There is simply "only" EVERYTHING."
That there is nobody, nobody knows. This sounds more than paradoxical to the ears of the supposed person...actually crazy.
Simply because it consists of this supposed knowledge.
The only thing she knows is living in concepts.
Therefore, of course, when it is said, "There is No One", the "translation" into the only thing she knows, namely a concept, automatically takes place.
But there is simply no one, who prays that here, MUST pray that here.
Just THAT one would be exactly the one, which has never existed. This impression to be somebody who inhabits these bodies and can cause things with power of decision out of himself is illusion. That is the suggestion :-)
No dogma.
No truth.
No anything.
No need to convince. Who then?
Who is there now that is missing something?
It's just obvious when it's obvious.
And then it is clear that no one needs to be taught anything or can be taught anything.
What can happen then, out of this clarity, is that either it is reported or it is not.
And both are equally the same thing.
There is no choice in it. That is also clear.
But what definitely no longer appears is the need for a change of what is.
That would be the "privilege" of that energy which has the impression to be ME.
And this again is neither wrong nor right, but likewise that what appears by itself or just no more.
So here is not the statement that the I must go away. Or that something is wrong.
Here is the statement, it can never be different than it is, by itself.
In it, however, it would be obvious that this ominous I never existed.
Because I is hope and the need linked with it on a better experience ( for myself).
What can happen, for no reason and for no purpose and without any condition, is that this obviousness indiscriminately and undeniably comes to light and thus reveals the timeless absence of that supposed instance (I).
What is then clear is that nothing has fallen away there and in reality nothing has changed, but that this I never and nowhere existed.
However, this remains just not as a concept of clarity.
What remains is completeness, because there is no more experience of being the center in everything.
There is simply "only" EVERYTHING."