SuperLutheran (Avignon Half) on Nostr: This is an admission of loss: >It's not on me to bear the burden of proof in this ...
This is an admission of loss:
>It's not on me to bear the burden of proof in this case. You guys are making the positive statement that niggers are humans. Your attempt here to shift the burden of proof in this case is itself proof of bad faith. Just because you don't like being in the position of having to defend a bad argument that you know is bad doesn't give you license to get out of it by burden of proof shifting.
You're the one telling people to disbelieve their lying eyes dude. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, has feathers like a duck, migrates like a duck, etc.... probably a duck dude. Africans are capable of things that only humans can do, like read and drive, operate firearms, learn skills, etcs. They got ten fingers, complete with opposable thumbs like anyone else. They can (at least some certainly have) achieve a measure of success in education. When was the last time a squirrel earned a doctorate? When did a parrot fill out a job application?
There are plenty of stupid, violent, ugly africans who act in immoral ways. Absolutely. Does that make them fauna? Well that would be an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence - and as Myles said, you haven't sufficiently provided it. All you've said is "well they're stupid and haven't achieved anything" - which a) isn't true of all africans and b) presents a standard for humanity which most people can't even meet.
Face it dude, you're begging the question, assuming your conclusion. If you want the world to take you seriously, give us a definition of "human" and demonstrate how every single negro categorically fails to live up to it.
>It's not on me to bear the burden of proof in this case. You guys are making the positive statement that niggers are humans. Your attempt here to shift the burden of proof in this case is itself proof of bad faith. Just because you don't like being in the position of having to defend a bad argument that you know is bad doesn't give you license to get out of it by burden of proof shifting.
You're the one telling people to disbelieve their lying eyes dude. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, has feathers like a duck, migrates like a duck, etc.... probably a duck dude. Africans are capable of things that only humans can do, like read and drive, operate firearms, learn skills, etcs. They got ten fingers, complete with opposable thumbs like anyone else. They can (at least some certainly have) achieve a measure of success in education. When was the last time a squirrel earned a doctorate? When did a parrot fill out a job application?
There are plenty of stupid, violent, ugly africans who act in immoral ways. Absolutely. Does that make them fauna? Well that would be an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence - and as Myles said, you haven't sufficiently provided it. All you've said is "well they're stupid and haven't achieved anything" - which a) isn't true of all africans and b) presents a standard for humanity which most people can't even meet.
Face it dude, you're begging the question, assuming your conclusion. If you want the world to take you seriously, give us a definition of "human" and demonstrate how every single negro categorically fails to live up to it.