frphank on Nostr: So if forces wanted to shut down a repo they could query nostr for the current set of ...
So if forces wanted to shut down a repo they could query nostr for the current set of servers recommended by the pubkeys whom they assume to be the maintainers.
The repo could then be set up again on a different set of servers and the locations published via events. Until those get shut down again etc. etc., effectively playing cat and mouse.
In other words, yes there is the one authoritative server, or set of servers with redundant identical content via replication, but it's too short-lived to be a viable target.
The repo could then be set up again on a different set of servers and the locations published via events. Until those get shut down again etc. etc., effectively playing cat and mouse.
In other words, yes there is the one authoritative server, or set of servers with redundant identical content via replication, but it's too short-lived to be a viable target.