manime on Nostr: Akshually … filters on relays is not only better for bandwidth and for “dumb” ...
Akshually … filters on relays is not only better for bandwidth and for “dumb” phones, but also opens the marketplace for end users to “subscribe” to and share the best filters, across clients.
Freedom of choice is what makes Nostr censorship resistant, not rigid protocols or lack of algos.
Freedom of choice is what makes Nostr censorship resistant, not rigid protocols or lack of algos.
quoting note1q2a…6awdSovereign Webs of Trust…
Curious?
*Read this article for my short take.*
https://yakihonne.com/article/naddr1qqgx2e3cxqenqef3x56kvd3nxymxzq3qmanlnflyzyjhgh970t8mmngrdytcp3jrmaa66u846ggg7t20cgqqxpqqqp65w7jk7e3
*Comment bellow to offer your own.*
1. What does Sovereign WoT mean to you?
2. Does it require “is trusted” (for a followed account) to be explicitly set by the user, or could “is trusted” be ONLY calculated by algos and still count as sovereign?
3. If explicit is required, can “is trusted” simply be a “follows” (kind3) list, or does it actually need a dedicated ( private event kind) “trusted” list?
4. Would (your) Sovereign WoT require that content filters follow users across clients, and be sharable by them?
5. Should these filters (for end users) be publishable ONLY by clients or ONLY by relays or ONLY by DVMs or ANY and ALL of these?