David A. Harding [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐ Original date posted:2021-09-06 ๐ Original message:On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at ...
๐
Original date posted:2021-09-06
๐ Original message:On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 09:29:01AM +0200, Eric Voskuil wrote:
> It doesnโt centralize payment, which ultimately controls transaction selection (censorship).
Yeah, but if you get paid after each share via LN and you can switch
pools instantly, then the worst case with centralized pools is that
you don't get paid for one share. If the hasher sets their share
difficulty low enough, that shouldn't be a big deal.
I'm interested in whether braidpool offers any significant benefits over
an idealized version of centralized mining with independent transaction
selection.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210905/26c8c9d4/attachment-0001.sig>
๐ Original message:On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 09:29:01AM +0200, Eric Voskuil wrote:
> It doesnโt centralize payment, which ultimately controls transaction selection (censorship).
Yeah, but if you get paid after each share via LN and you can switch
pools instantly, then the worst case with centralized pools is that
you don't get paid for one share. If the hasher sets their share
difficulty low enough, that shouldn't be a big deal.
I'm interested in whether braidpool offers any significant benefits over
an idealized version of centralized mining with independent transaction
selection.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210905/26c8c9d4/attachment-0001.sig>