npub1z9…g7jc5 on Nostr: npub1ks4j7…dx88p It sounds like you might be talking about the actual rollout ...
npub1ks4j70qusuv7hnaqcrr3azks95fxjpz4sx29sy9h35z3vltwaunsmdx88p (npub1ks4…x88p) It sounds like you might be talking about the actual rollout rather than the protocol itself, which is kind of a different issue.
The AT protocol is decentralized even if nobody takes advantage of that feature. So it could be theory versus reality, and I’m talking about the theory, even if in reality right now the network isn’t particularly built out yet.
But speaking of the protocol, as I recall one difference is that, the way you frame it, your mobile doesn’t have to talk to A relay. It can talk to multiple relays, as many as it wants, it’s in control. The control over who to talk to is distributed down to your mobile.
AP puts everything at the instance level. Your mobile has to talk to your instance, no other instance. And not multiple instances. Your mobile is bound to your instance.
With AP your mobile is really just an extension of the instance. With AT the relays work for the mobile.
Hyolobrika (npub1pqp…e753)
The AT protocol is decentralized even if nobody takes advantage of that feature. So it could be theory versus reality, and I’m talking about the theory, even if in reality right now the network isn’t particularly built out yet.
But speaking of the protocol, as I recall one difference is that, the way you frame it, your mobile doesn’t have to talk to A relay. It can talk to multiple relays, as many as it wants, it’s in control. The control over who to talk to is distributed down to your mobile.
AP puts everything at the instance level. Your mobile has to talk to your instance, no other instance. And not multiple instances. Your mobile is bound to your instance.
With AP your mobile is really just an extension of the instance. With AT the relays work for the mobile.
Hyolobrika (npub1pqp…e753)