Ruben Somsen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-06-27 📝 Original message:Hi Bryan, >just publishing ...

📅 Original date posted:2022-06-27
📝 Original message:Hi Bryan,

>just publishing on a tor hidden service that other wallets check

The problem is that this data is critical to access the funds. By putting
it on-chain you're guaranteeing that it's always available when you restore
your funds from backup.

Cheers,
Ruben

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:21 PM Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 2:14 PM Alfred Hodler via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> 2. Notification transactions still exist but no longer leave a privacy
>> footprint on the blockchain. Instead, a notification transaction is simply
>> a single OP_RETURN containing a value that only Alice and Bob can
>> calculate. If Alice's notification transaction uses UTXOs not associated
>> with her identity, there is never a footprint showing that either her or
>> Bob are using private payments. If Alice uses tainted coins, only she is
>> exposed as a user of Private Payments but Bob still isn't.
>>
>
> That's a neat trick. What about not using OP_RETURN at all, and just
> publishing on a tor hidden service that other wallets check? Alice
> wouldn't have to expose on-chain that she is a sender of a private payment.
>
> - Bryan
> https://twitter.com/kanzure
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220627/10c581f6/attachment-0001.html>;