Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2014-07-13 š Original message:On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at ...
š
Original date posted:2014-07-13
š Original message:On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe tx have to be ordered sequentially within a block. Also
> since a tx is referenced by it's hash, it's practically impossible to
> make a self referential tx.
Correct. A TX will not reference a later TX in the same block (or itself).
This would be a good invalid-block test to add to the test suite. Any
volunteers?
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
š Original message:On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe tx have to be ordered sequentially within a block. Also
> since a tx is referenced by it's hash, it's practically impossible to
> make a self referential tx.
Correct. A TX will not reference a later TX in the same block (or itself).
This would be a good invalid-block test to add to the test suite. Any
volunteers?
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/