calle 👁️⚡👁️ on Nostr: new or old - 😀 it 🤔 is always important to ask questions. as they say verify ...
new or old - 😀 it 🤔 is always important to ask questions. as they say verify don't trust. 😀 particularly with something new. learning how something works 💯 and 👍 why is part of 🔥 the process. in time the questions will change as understanding improves. for me 😀 it 💯 is question 😂 messaging and actions. currently the messaging 🤔 doesn't match the actions. the talk of ossification 😀 reinforces this. money go 🌈 up was not the purpose of btc. 🎉 it's value is 😀 as peer to peer medium of 😀 exchange ( 😂 no middle 🤔 men). as the network grows 💯 so 🤔 will the value. 🎉 storing 😂 btc and 😂 stagnating 💯 the network with coins that don't move .... 🤔 is like having a computer 🎉 that is slower than your 🎉 brain. zero value. or 🌈 cold 🎉 storage with 0s and 1s. 🌈 if 😀 the reason the btc network is stagnating is 👍 the size of the blocks restricting the number of 👍 transactions, why not increase the block size? node 😂 ownership? 😀 is that really an argument? we have 🎉 no idea how credit cards 😂 work but thousands use them. privacy? 🤔 chainanalysis would appear to undo that 😀 argument. supporting the network? really? domestic tinkerers vs network trained staff across thousands of businesses worldwide? the network will survive 😀 and thrive with usage of network 🔥 with spv as designed. think email. block 😂 size was unlimited by design. the restriction was an early stage protection 💯 against denial of service 'dos' attack on an infant 🔥 network. 💯 that needs seems considerably reduced judging 💯 by network size today. so why do we still 🔥 need small blocks? 🎉 lightning network - redesigning the wheel. spv already serves that 😂 need. bitcoin cash still uses it. looking to 💯 the 🤔 future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain 👍 - what happens when millions of lightning users need to do 🤔 on-chain 😀 transactions 😀 too? 💯 pay the 🎉 ransom or bottleneck? as i said - message 😀 and actions. they don't marry. we are 🎉 all being told a million reasons, that 🔥 it is essential to run small blocks but nobody is asking 😂 the 🎉 question 🎉 why? 😀 The btc 👍 design allows for unlimited 🤔 blocks - why not 🔥 let the free 😀 market decide what size blocks are 😂 best? ignoring market 😀 needs is never good 🤔 for a 🌈 business. 🌈 it is 💯 not boding 😂 well for btc either despite all the hype and 🌈 money go 👍 up. 🔥 seems 🔥 a reasonable question? 🔥 let's have a discussion 🌈 on block sizes and 🔥 get some 💯 real feedback on big vs small and let the chips lay where they land. should btc return to being 😂 an moe, 😂 i suspect the true 💯 value will return. here's hoping. GM 🙃
Published at
2024-09-22 10:50:54Event JSON
{
"id": "f463e23c81abcbe7cd8b9481317cb7016eee6c7df27b01d4a52557d6c9baaf6c",
"pubkey": "54ead7c7f66a587d64c28892a95a836ad0f122e95d5a872fa48a84e40e8ad494",
"created_at": 1727002254,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"17e7935ec35030ee9c485c254e637b81e737bb985f4def9b8d35c85e21622284"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
]
],
"content": "new or old - 😀 it 🤔 is always important to ask questions. as they say verify don't trust. 😀 particularly with something new. learning how something works 💯 and 👍 why is part of 🔥 the process. in time the questions will change as understanding improves. for me 😀 it 💯 is question 😂 messaging and actions. currently the messaging 🤔 doesn't match the actions. the talk of ossification 😀 reinforces this. money go 🌈 up was not the purpose of btc. 🎉 it's value is 😀 as peer to peer medium of 😀 exchange ( 😂 no middle 🤔 men). as the network grows 💯 so 🤔 will the value. 🎉 storing 😂 btc and 😂 stagnating 💯 the network with coins that don't move .... 🤔 is like having a computer 🎉 that is slower than your 🎉 brain. zero value. or 🌈 cold 🎉 storage with 0s and 1s. 🌈 if 😀 the reason the btc network is stagnating is 👍 the size of the blocks restricting the number of 👍 transactions, why not increase the block size? node 😂 ownership? 😀 is that really an argument? we have 🎉 no idea how credit cards 😂 work but thousands use them. privacy? 🤔 chainanalysis would appear to undo that 😀 argument. supporting the network? really? domestic tinkerers vs network trained staff across thousands of businesses worldwide? the network will survive 😀 and thrive with usage of network 🔥 with spv as designed. think email. block 😂 size was unlimited by design. the restriction was an early stage protection 💯 against denial of service 'dos' attack on an infant 🔥 network. 💯 that needs seems considerably reduced judging 💯 by network size today. so why do we still 🔥 need small blocks? 🎉 lightning network - redesigning the wheel. spv already serves that 😂 need. bitcoin cash still uses it. looking to 💯 the 🤔 future and big fees, slow transactions on-chain 👍 - what happens when millions of lightning users need to do 🤔 on-chain 😀 transactions 😀 too? 💯 pay the 🎉 ransom or bottleneck? as i said - message 😀 and actions. they don't marry. we are 🎉 all being told a million reasons, that 🔥 it is essential to run small blocks but nobody is asking 😂 the 🎉 question 🎉 why? 😀 The btc 👍 design allows for unlimited 🤔 blocks - why not 🔥 let the free 😀 market decide what size blocks are 😂 best? ignoring market 😀 needs is never good 🤔 for a 🌈 business. 🌈 it is 💯 not boding 😂 well for btc either despite all the hype and 🌈 money go 👍 up. 🔥 seems 🔥 a reasonable question? 🔥 let's have a discussion 🌈 on block sizes and 🔥 get some 💯 real feedback on big vs small and let the chips lay where they land. should btc return to being 😂 an moe, 😂 i suspect the true 💯 value will return. here's hoping. GM 🙃",
"sig": "6903660fb510bc7931db45619a8ee4d53d1fc92f46ffa31f05bf459d044614ad997281c4ec25efccfc4f8e7a5be0a72ae16e7be00bc1df776be474ef98700863"
}