📅 Original date posted:2019-02-06 📝 Original message:I do not think this ad ...

Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] /

npub1cce…x8m8

2023-06-07 18:16:25

in reply to nevent1q…kt9w

📅 Original date posted:2019-02-06
📝 Original message:I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was justified.

I wrote code, gathered and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed
understanding of non technical issues. Is there an actual action that
defies my observation that a commitment is not yet in sight?

Is there anything technically wrong in what I wrote?

If not you should stop.

Tamas Blummer

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 18:17 Gregory Maxwell <greg at xiph.org wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon.
> [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and
> attractive, for some taste too much more.
>
> You keep repeating this smear. Please stop.
>
> If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was
> discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest
> from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a
> significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that
> end. It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your
> negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't even
> invested the time required to read their words.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190206/8a032707/attachment-0001.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 18:16:25

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "f4b35bf1310e67c47b6c4c05b4d956198cdd39e86e951b19069be0b50e9cac44", "pubkey": "c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7", "created_at": 1686161785, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "97c0ce78b62d3274e700b5b31976e55b4f8b4af0d55ebfe0f570f183e8cfddf3", "", "root" ], [ "e", "f2f9d5d93d1f949c4ac3ac6da6232f12d8aa205beb7bd193fdcd9181e69357d9", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-02-06\n📝 Original message:I do not think this ad hominem attack of you on me was justified.\n\nI wrote code, gathered and shared data now and back in 2018. I showed\nunderstanding of non technical issues. Is there an actual action that\ndefies my observation that a commitment is not yet in sight?\n\nIs there anything technically wrong in what I wrote?\n\nIf not you should stop.\n\nTamas Blummer\n\n\nOn Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 18:17 Gregory Maxwell \u003cgreg at xiph.org wrote:\n\n\u003e On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer \u003ctamas.blummer at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon.\n\u003e [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and\n\u003e attractive, for some taste too much more.\n\u003e\n\u003e You keep repeating this smear. Please stop.\n\u003e\n\u003e If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was\n\u003e discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest\n\u003e from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a\n\u003e significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that\n\u003e end. It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your\n\u003e negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't even\n\u003e invested the time required to read their words.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190206/8a032707/attachment-0001.html\u003e", "sig": "b4cda37d497c872957050257967917730fc9e8c79806935d7b94051a0ed96baa7134006b0b716552f18b0dbb9dd26a1aaa3995927fd749320598e22e92eb77b3" }