Pindar Wong [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-03-11 📝 Original message:Understood... perhaps just ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-03-11
📝 Original message:Understood... perhaps just add something like:
'After copy-editing and acceptance,* a BIP number is assigned* and it will
be published here.'?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals
p.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Pindar Wong <pindar.wong at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Perhaps at some point consider introducing something akin to a
> > 'Bitcoin-Draft' (BD) status with some autoexpiry period?
> >
> > I understand that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has the
> > concept of 'Internet Drafts" (ID) and this looks like it has worked for
> them
> > so far.
>
> Thats more or less what posting to the list is supposed to be.
> Creating a draft document requires no approval, beyond filling out the
> right form.
>
> Perhaps calling out that as a distinct step would be better, indeed.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150312/35027fd0/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:Understood... perhaps just add something like:
'After copy-editing and acceptance,* a BIP number is assigned* and it will
be published here.'?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals
p.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Pindar Wong <pindar.wong at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Perhaps at some point consider introducing something akin to a
> > 'Bitcoin-Draft' (BD) status with some autoexpiry period?
> >
> > I understand that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has the
> > concept of 'Internet Drafts" (ID) and this looks like it has worked for
> them
> > so far.
>
> Thats more or less what posting to the list is supposed to be.
> Creating a draft document requires no approval, beyond filling out the
> right form.
>
> Perhaps calling out that as a distinct step would be better, indeed.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150312/35027fd0/attachment.html>