Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2013-05-08 š Original message:On Wed, May 8, 2013 at ...
š
Original date posted:2013-05-08
š Original message:On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:00 PM, John Dillon
<john.dillon892 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps Satoshi did this delibrately, knowing that at some point a hard-fork
> would be a good idea, so that we all would have a good excuse to do one?
Guffaw :) The year 2038 is so far in the future that it is not really
relevant, from that angle.
We need a hard fork to break the 1MB limit, and Satoshi explicitly
presumed that would happen sometime in the future.
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik at exmulti.com
š Original message:On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:00 PM, John Dillon
<john.dillon892 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps Satoshi did this delibrately, knowing that at some point a hard-fork
> would be a good idea, so that we all would have a good excuse to do one?
Guffaw :) The year 2038 is so far in the future that it is not really
relevant, from that angle.
We need a hard fork to break the 1MB limit, and Satoshi explicitly
presumed that would happen sometime in the future.
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik at exmulti.com