📅 Original date posted:2015-06-01 📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at ...

Pindar Wong [ARCHIVE] /

npub1gg0…7uvk

2023-06-07 15:36:03

in reply to nevent1q…frk7

📅 Original date posted:2015-06-01
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:

> Whilst it would be nice if miners in China can carry on forever regardless
> of their internet situation, nobody has any inherent "right" to mine if
> they can't do the job - if miners in China can't get the trivial amounts of
> bandwidth required through their firewall and end up being outcompeted then
> OK, too bad, we'll have to carry on without them.
>

I'd rather think of mining as a responsibility than a right per se, but
you're right in so far as it's competitive and self-correcting.

>
> But I'm not sure why it should be a big deal. They can always run a node
> on a server in Taiwan and connect the hardware to it via a VPN or so.
>
>
Let's agree to disagree on this point.

p.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150601/46657e6a/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1gg0pysd236d4em7pts906ev9kf6f30j8werd40j2vwpes7fqdn4qtt7uvk

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:36:03

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "fc4331d8cbbf71255a916c25e886f85e61a96a540134e554bdb03c3162ed9eec", "pubkey": "421e1241aa8e9b5cefc15c0afd6585b27498be477646dabe4a63839879206cea", "created_at": 1686152163, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "112d0de527f63b466f07e709b55d1d4965f1c304d12170877aafb66f5cb05c67", "", "root" ], [ "e", "ddd2f3bc74108a8bc5ee6a97150ec7e85549b2390291578c9d69b1e676282580", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-01\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Whilst it would be nice if miners in China can carry on forever regardless\n\u003e of their internet situation, nobody has any inherent \"right\" to mine if\n\u003e they can't do the job - if miners in China can't get the trivial amounts of\n\u003e bandwidth required through their firewall and end up being outcompeted then\n\u003e OK, too bad, we'll have to carry on without them.\n\u003e\n\nI'd rather think of mining as a responsibility than a right per se, but\nyou're right in so far as it's competitive and self-correcting.\n\n\n\u003e\n\u003e But I'm not sure why it should be a big deal. They can always run a node\n\u003e on a server in Taiwan and connect the hardware to it via a VPN or so.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n Let's agree to disagree on this point.\n\np.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150601/46657e6a/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "31c954233c134c39bb37f2432940c4f2f736a734f810a516a4e6ce405efebe59dbedbaf364bc9ed7c857d9d5480980d4024452fe869215ebef380f12b598f0a1" }