Artemesia on Nostr: npub1grx4w…suxfe Ok, I'll bite on the rhetorical question. It's not that big a deal ...
npub1grx4wzqldf8clxusxpz78adjcukkqvdkhf8amsdhr6sy3ctuu2fqvsuxfe (npub1grx…uxfe)
Ok, I'll bite on the rhetorical question. It's not that big a deal because it isn't and wasn't illegal to pay off Stormy for her silence, what was illegal was the coverup of the payment, which involved bookkeeping fraud. This time his attorneys just offered a pathetic $30k reduction on a $650k settlement on Stormy's defamation suit, which she lost (Avenatti turned out to be a poor choice of attorneys). Offering a $30k reduction isn't illegal, and neither was paying Stormy $130k back in 2016. BTW, Stormy of course turned down that $30k reduction.
Ok, I'll bite on the rhetorical question. It's not that big a deal because it isn't and wasn't illegal to pay off Stormy for her silence, what was illegal was the coverup of the payment, which involved bookkeeping fraud. This time his attorneys just offered a pathetic $30k reduction on a $650k settlement on Stormy's defamation suit, which she lost (Avenatti turned out to be a poor choice of attorneys). Offering a $30k reduction isn't illegal, and neither was paying Stormy $130k back in 2016. BTW, Stormy of course turned down that $30k reduction.