rfkill on Nostr: A minarchist would argue that maintaining a monopoly on the initiation of force ...
A minarchist would argue that maintaining a monopoly on the initiation of force within a territory is the one legitimate function of government. An an-cap would argue for what is effetively a decentralized version of the same thing. The peer-to-peer legal system itself would act to behaviours not consistent with the NAP.
Published at
2024-09-18 18:43:15Event JSON
{
"id": "f2b22ef69c0c5888c6f827e8373f6b6c87c54482c47c456f5be51a5c92a8722f",
"pubkey": "c5273075de02a2beedad450ff60f0d47c67f28a2299fb804611d3ee5219df5f4",
"created_at": 1726684995,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"882bd5a2cf4cb7f05931ee6301891a12d43703ec98aab04443ac1e09c5915a78",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"1bd32a386a7be6f688b3dc7c480efc21cd946b43eac14ba4ba7834ac77a23e69"
]
],
"content": "A minarchist would argue that maintaining a monopoly on the initiation of force within a territory is the one legitimate function of government. An an-cap would argue for what is effetively a decentralized version of the same thing. The peer-to-peer legal system itself would act to behaviours not consistent with the NAP.",
"sig": "dba8f9c5572eafb3eec72e263e28f6b4134a0a881dd103a7d579e4ec6c44508f44d95277f950dead0596d7756305329bb12a798b973ecb7c2cb9543679f3a286"
}
