Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-04-20 📝 Original message:Here is an earlier ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-04-20
📝 Original message:Here is an earlier reference to bits:

https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg04248.html

I forgot that Alan Reiner was also supporting a unit equals to bits :

https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg04264.html

and here the earlier going back to March 2013 and a poll at that time pushing for XBT being 1 bit

https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg04256.html

Regards,

Tamas Blummer
http://bitsofproof.com

On 20.04.2014, at 16:53, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille at gmail.com> wrote:

> I told him specifically to bring it here (on a pull request for
> Bitcoin Core), as there is no point in making such convention changes
> to just one client.
>
> I wasn't aware of any discussion about the "bits" proposal here before.
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas at bitsofproof.com> wrote:
>> People on this list are mostly engineers who have no problem dealing with
>> magnitudes and have rather limited empathy for people who have a problem
>> with them.
>> They also tend to think, that because they invented money 2.0 they would not
>> need to care of finance's or people's current customs.
>>
>> The importance of their decisions in these questions will fade as people
>> already use wallets other than the core.
>>
>> Bring this particular discussion elsewhere, to the wallet developer.
>>
>> BTW the topic was discussed here several times, you have my support and Jeff
>> Garzik's.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tamas Blummer
>> http://bitsofproof.com
>>
>> On 20.04.2014, at 15:15, Rob Golding <rob.golding at astutium.com> wrote:
>>
>> The average person is not going to be confident that the prefix they
>> are using is the correct one,
>>
>>
>> The use of any 'prefix' is one of choice and entirely unnecessary, and there
>> are already established 'divisions' in u/mBTC for those that feel they need
>> to use such things.
>>
>> people WILL send 1000x more or less than
>> intended if we go down this road,
>>
>>
>> Exceptionally unlikely - I deal every day with currencies with 0, 2 and 3
>> dp's in amount ranging from 'under 1 whole unit' to tens of thousands - Not
>> once in 20 years has anyone ever 'sent' more or less than intended - oh,
>> they've 'intended' to underpay just fine, but never *unintended*.
>>
>> I propose that users are offered a preference to denominate the
>> Bitcoin currency in a unit called a bit. Where one bitcoin (BTC)
>> equals one million bits (bits) and one bit equals 100 satoshis.
>>
>>
>> I propose that for people unable to understand what a bitcoin is, they can
>> just use satoshi's and drop this entire proposal.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
>> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
>> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
>> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
>> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
>> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
>> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140420/33517770/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140420/33517770/attachment.sig>;