Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19 📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:44 AM, <justusranvier at riseup.net> wrote:

> If we have ECDSA proof that an entity intentionally made and publicly
> announced incompatible promises regarding the disposition of particular
> Bitcoins under their control, then why shouldn't that be assumed to be a
> fraud attempt unless shown otherwise?
>

Making multiple incompatible versions of a spend is a -requirement- of
various refund contract protocols.

--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150619/a49350a3/attachment.html>;