Brooke Vibber :blobcatcoffee: on Nostr: yep, extra RAM won't add much here. fastest video encoding is usually through GPU ...
yep, extra RAM won't add much here.
fastest video encoding is usually through GPU *but* bitrate/quality tends to be poor because those chips are made for realtime and don't explore expensive checks for best compression.
CPU-based encoding will usually benefit well from more cores, with caveats (some formats' libraries scale weirdly *cough* libvpx *cough*)
For x264 or x265 you def want 1) more cores 2) faster cores 3) ideally avx2, in that order of preference
fastest video encoding is usually through GPU *but* bitrate/quality tends to be poor because those chips are made for realtime and don't explore expensive checks for best compression.
CPU-based encoding will usually benefit well from more cores, with caveats (some formats' libraries scale weirdly *cough* libvpx *cough*)
For x264 or x265 you def want 1) more cores 2) faster cores 3) ideally avx2, in that order of preference