Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2012-02-20 📝 Original message:On Monday, February 20, ...
📅 Original date posted:2012-02-20
📝 Original message:On Monday, February 20, 2012 6:17:01 AM Michael Grønager wrote:
> Just posted this on the wiki BIP-13 discussion - should I make it into a
> BIP of its own ?
If you must. However, BIP 13 has been pretty much undisputed, and only held
back by BIP 16/17 so far...
> The "version" portion of the address has so far been labeled "network id",
> and indicates from which network and which chain the address can be used
> for.
Where do you see this? It has always been "version" as far as I am aware, and
we discussed formalizing the details of the bits in it a few months back.
In any case, it was certainly originally intended as "version" as can be
observed in Satoshi's reference implementation.
📝 Original message:On Monday, February 20, 2012 6:17:01 AM Michael Grønager wrote:
> Just posted this on the wiki BIP-13 discussion - should I make it into a
> BIP of its own ?
If you must. However, BIP 13 has been pretty much undisputed, and only held
back by BIP 16/17 so far...
> The "version" portion of the address has so far been labeled "network id",
> and indicates from which network and which chain the address can be used
> for.
Where do you see this? It has always been "version" as far as I am aware, and
we discussed formalizing the details of the bits in it a few months back.
In any case, it was certainly originally intended as "version" as can be
observed in Satoshi's reference implementation.