Erik Aronesty [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2023-05-08 🗒️ Summary of this message: A proposal to ...

📅 Original date posted:2023-05-08
🗒️ Summary of this message: A proposal to change transaction "max fee" to output amounts could harm applications like OpenTimestamps, and CPFP is a better defense against non-money use cases.
📝 Original message:fair. i suppose you could support cpfp in any dust filtering. im not a
fan, but I think its the only legit way to defend the chain from non money
use cases

On Mon, May 8, 2023, 7:58 PM Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:

> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 07:59:40PM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > possible to change tx "max fee" to output amounts?
> >
> > seems like the only use case that would support such a tx is spam/dos
> type
> > stuff that satoshi warned about
> >
> > its not a fix for everything, but it seems could help a bit with certain
> > attacks
>
> With CPFP it often makes sense for a transaction to have a fee larger than
> the
> output amounts.
>
> This proposal would also screw over applications like my OpenTimestamps
> service.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230508/ef79bcc2/attachment.html>;