Event JSON
{
"id": "fa9850d59e9add24baf112bb2dd51b0a0d9ebd4d97f5fbe441c3181e2ebd2fe7",
"pubkey": "406cda1605d9d95b1e39a78327c3891afba2baecd30a02b403c900e6d3f9bb58",
"created_at": 1689427527,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"b4c50e1bc1d7c4e1372d0c767c4705509f070b0f3109447d90cd0eb34a992896",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"f7346eb283902ada9d21c109a93e83128d9f87d8fcfe70ad819b3bf2ad9bce16",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"a6d4c4c0ccab8e4448e0d623adff5ec70dee01be695e93b2c5a893c739b8d9a2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/users/andrejbauer/statuses/110718322431266858"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1knzsux7p6lzwzdedp3m8c3c92z0swzc0xyy5glvse58txj5e9ztqpac73p I always get the impression that physicists speak in terms of analogies and high-level ideas that cannot be properly understood with a great deal of technical knowledge, a substratum of sorts. Is this correct? If so, how does one get to know about the technical substratum without selling their soul?",
"sig": "f1b28775066da8d66aa580e0d7f5c95ec27353470bb48c9075b1aaffd13fa62115324133172de97c053433d67820e13349abe1174d00f0fa72ae4515f0dbb8ac"
}
