Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27 📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27
📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> That said, I'm not convinced about the extra layers. The "cointype" in
> my opinion isn't necessary inside the derivation. There is already
> support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside
Cointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>
📝 Original message:On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> That said, I'm not convinced about the extra layers. The "cointype" in
> my opinion isn't necessary inside the derivation. There is already
> support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside
Cointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>