John Carlos Baez on Nostr: ๐ง๐๐ ๐ก๐๐ฃ๐ง๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ง Once we ...
๐ง๐๐ ๐ก๐๐ฃ๐ง๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ง
Once we knew just one solar system. Now we can see ๐ฉ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ด of solar systems and learn how they work on average! We are learning amazing things, like this:
Here's a chart showing planets whose year is 25 Earth days long or less. These planets are very close to their suns. There's a big blob of planets with mass 10-20 times the Earth's mass, whose year is just 1-10 days long! These are called ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ฒ๐.
But there's an interesting shortage of slightly less massive planets that are quite close to their sun. This is called the ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐. And there's another less dramatic shortage of planets in the ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ฎ. Both these need to be explained.
Now we have a new clue. This September astronomers discovered that the desert and savanna are separated by a region with more planets, which they call the ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ.
What does it all mean? There are lots of theories, but it will take a while to figure it out.
Here's the new paper:
โข A. Castro-Gonzรกlez, V. Bourrier, J. Lillo-Box, J.-B. Delisle, D. J. Armstrong, D. Barrado and A. C. M. Correia, Mapping the exo-Neptunian landscape: a ridge between the desert and savanna, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10517.
With all this work we need to think about 'selection bias': some planets are easier to see than others, so what we see is not the same as the real situation! So, a lot of this paper is about compensating for selection bias.
For a link to a gentler, less technical article, read on.
(1/2)
Once we knew just one solar system. Now we can see ๐ฉ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ด of solar systems and learn how they work on average! We are learning amazing things, like this:
Here's a chart showing planets whose year is 25 Earth days long or less. These planets are very close to their suns. There's a big blob of planets with mass 10-20 times the Earth's mass, whose year is just 1-10 days long! These are called ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ฒ๐.
But there's an interesting shortage of slightly less massive planets that are quite close to their sun. This is called the ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐. And there's another less dramatic shortage of planets in the ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ฎ. Both these need to be explained.
Now we have a new clue. This September astronomers discovered that the desert and savanna are separated by a region with more planets, which they call the ๐ก๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ.
What does it all mean? There are lots of theories, but it will take a while to figure it out.
Here's the new paper:
โข A. Castro-Gonzรกlez, V. Bourrier, J. Lillo-Box, J.-B. Delisle, D. J. Armstrong, D. Barrado and A. C. M. Correia, Mapping the exo-Neptunian landscape: a ridge between the desert and savanna, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10517.
With all this work we need to think about 'selection bias': some planets are easier to see than others, so what we see is not the same as the real situation! So, a lot of this paper is about compensating for selection bias.
For a link to a gentler, less technical article, read on.
(1/2)