npub1z9…g7jc5 on Nostr: npub1kpwlx…xxzz4 The idea is that this isn't a judge restraining free speech as ...
npub1kpwlxpzkxfmuxjmzc2wp3rf9vjg0sgydmlhsnrgqr3maf59h86qqdxxzz4 (npub1kpw…xzz4) The idea is that this isn't a judge restraining free speech as much as maintaining order in his court, including the parts of court proceedings that happen outside the literal courtroom.
If a person was in the courtroom during the trial and wouldn't sit down and shut up when it wasn't their turn to speak, the judge could respond to that, right? It wouldn't be seen as a free speech violation, but rather just the judge giving others their chance to do their jobs?
Same thing here.
It wouldn't be punishment over speech--it would be jailing as a way to prevent interference with the court proceedings.
If a person was in the courtroom during the trial and wouldn't sit down and shut up when it wasn't their turn to speak, the judge could respond to that, right? It wouldn't be seen as a free speech violation, but rather just the judge giving others their chance to do their jobs?
Same thing here.
It wouldn't be punishment over speech--it would be jailing as a way to prevent interference with the court proceedings.