Karl-Johan Alm [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-06-05 📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-06-05
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Jim Posen <jim.posen at gmail.com> wrote:
> It also derives all bandwidth gains from address reuse. So I'm
> hesitant to make the complexity tradeoff for bandwidth savings due to a
> behavior that is actively discouraged.
I don't understand this comment. The bandwidth gains are not from
address reuse, they are from the observed property that false
positives are independent between two filters. I.e. clients that
connect once a day will probably download 2-3 filters at most, if they
had nothing relevant in the last ~144 blocks.
-Kalle.
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Jim Posen <jim.posen at gmail.com> wrote:
> It also derives all bandwidth gains from address reuse. So I'm
> hesitant to make the complexity tradeoff for bandwidth savings due to a
> behavior that is actively discouraged.
I don't understand this comment. The bandwidth gains are not from
address reuse, they are from the observed property that false
positives are independent between two filters. I.e. clients that
connect once a day will probably download 2-3 filters at most, if they
had nothing relevant in the last ~144 blocks.
-Kalle.