Terence Eden on Nostr: npub1wtsac…a655h That sounds like the opposite of what you want. Unless you mean ...
npub1wtsac00eajdxpp7ce9s0vqtuec8gshwxw3q44stynws0sjh7kmkqma655h (npub1wts…655h)
That sounds like the opposite of what you want. Unless you mean "pay their bills *in proportion* to their wealth"?
Because, at the moment, the least wealthy 6% already pay less than 6% of the global tax bill.
We both agree that wealthy people should be taxed more. I'm saying that blaming 1,300 people is an unhelpful and inaccurate simplification.
This isn't "quibbling". Without a broadly accurate argument, you might just as well say "higher taxes for people who wear glasses."
That sounds like the opposite of what you want. Unless you mean "pay their bills *in proportion* to their wealth"?
Because, at the moment, the least wealthy 6% already pay less than 6% of the global tax bill.
We both agree that wealthy people should be taxed more. I'm saying that blaming 1,300 people is an unhelpful and inaccurate simplification.
This isn't "quibbling". Without a broadly accurate argument, you might just as well say "higher taxes for people who wear glasses."