Louis :emacs: on Nostr: I've seen a lot of pro-#Fossil, anti-#Git discussion recently. Not that I love Git, ...
I've seen a lot of pro-#Fossil, anti-#Git discussion recently.
Not that I love Git, but it does the job and almost all deployment platform have support for Git only.
And, am I the only one who needs a staging area because I have to commit only a part of my changes? Often even line-based.
And, sometimes I want to squash 20 ugly commits into a single one, destructively changing the commit history. Really!
Any, sometimes I need a hosting platform for a project and there not a single serious one for Fossil. What's the point in using Fossil when I have to do a Git-export?
And, most importantly, there is #Magit
.
So ... although I can feel the love for Fossil, it simply doesn't work for most of my use cases.
Not that I love Git, but it does the job and almost all deployment platform have support for Git only.
And, am I the only one who needs a staging area because I have to commit only a part of my changes? Often even line-based.
And, sometimes I want to squash 20 ugly commits into a single one, destructively changing the commit history. Really!
Any, sometimes I need a hosting platform for a project and there not a single serious one for Fossil. What's the point in using Fossil when I have to do a Git-export?
And, most importantly, there is #Magit
.So ... although I can feel the love for Fossil, it simply doesn't work for most of my use cases.