HanShan on Nostr: isnt that 4.2 number back from when the ring size was 11? I think with the current ...
isnt that 4.2 number back from when the ring size was 11?
I think with the current size its more like 5.1
and worth noting that its just a statistical indicator
not deterministic establishment
Published at
2025-02-23 11:55:17Event JSON
{
"id": "f78d0ca14790ee01581927b075cfb379cf089720c45589ac95d1ef9117522690",
"pubkey": "f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb",
"created_at": 1740311717,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e00d60341134d136a1dfc59f1bcb2fe2a9ce781f2cfb6bea249595bd4577c0ad",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"af740d198babb8c7b82d0a4718eb354bb3f6af9a98639b85d4a5cf1371caba85",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"e",
"eac1a78c9853e7e4e01e4e084d1b9ae38c3c396913e339f041db07f3c8ffe3e0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7f0564227ab918c81a4466143f1dac30d842176a500656459605725c75721f67",
"",
"reply"
]
],
"content": "isnt that 4.2 number back from when the ring size was 11?\nI think with the current size its more like 5.1\n\nand worth noting that its just a statistical indicator \nnot deterministic establishment ",
"sig": "0f1750cbc579814f6361f7acc8d92c622dfe2ce75506e256f8d352852e1b2409c3ab1eaa9fdd7fec892e88f2cc92b419960129363c032c95fa3f22c81e920fb3"
}
