Neuralink’s CONVOY Study

Neuralink’s latest spectacle—the CONVOY Study—claims to empower paralyzed individuals with mind-controlled robotic arms. At first glance, it’s a technological marvel, but beneath the gloss lies a darker agenda: the privatization of human thought itself.

The Brain as a Corporate Territory

The N1 Implant, Neuralink’s flagship brain-computer interface (BCI), is a closed system. It operates like a digital fortress: 1,024 electrodes threading into your brain, collecting data, translating intentions into actions—then keeping the workings of it all behind Neuralink’s iron gate. For all the talk of freedom, this is about as liberating as handing over your neural impulses to a terms-of-service agreement.

It’s no coincidence that this technology is proprietary. By keeping it closed-source, Neuralink ensures that no one outside their corporate bubble has the ability to examine, replicate, or innovate upon it. This locks humanity’s next frontier—direct neural interfaces—behind the intellectual property walls of a single corporation. It’s a textbook case of enclosure: just as land and resources were fenced off in the name of profit during earlier centuries, now it’s the human brain itself being partitioned.

Parallels to the Fiat Scam

If you think this is hyperbole, look at fiat currency. Central banks control it, devalue it, and manipulate it under the guise of stability. Similarly, Neuralink positions itself as a gatekeeper of neural sovereignty. It is the fiat system all over again—this time, not content with controlling your money, they’re coming for your mind.

Much like inflation robs people of purchasing power, Neuralink’s proprietary model robs humanity of the collective potential of open innovation. It ensures that even as you control robotic arms, the corporate overlords control you.

Austrian Economics for Neurotechnology

Austrian economics emphasizes decentralization and individual sovereignty. It’s no accident that the most transformative technological force in the financial world—Bitcoin—is open source. Bitcoin succeeds because no single entity controls it, and its code is available for scrutiny and innovation by anyone.

Imagine if Neuralink adopted this ethos. An open-source brain-computer interface could transform lives without centralizing power. Developers worldwide could collaborate to refine it, and individuals could truly own their neural autonomy. Instead, Neuralink has chosen the authoritarian path—innovation without accountability, control without consent.

Freedom Can’t Be Proprietary

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is not about “helping the disabled”; this is about normalizing corporate ownership of the very essence of human agency. Neuralink doesn’t just create a product—it creates dependence. Today it’s robotic arms for quadriplegics. Tomorrow it’s neural data for advertisers, governments, the “Elite” and whoever else pays the price of admission.

And when the implants are ubiquitous, what happens to dissent? To privacy? To the idea that your thoughts belong to you?

Bitcoin as the Antidote

Bitcoin shows us another way: a decentralized, transparent system that restores power to individuals. Neuralink could have been the Bitcoin of neurotechnology—an open platform that amplifies human potential without centralizing control. Instead, it’s the Federal Reserve of your brain, selling freedom while consolidating power.

Resist the Neural Dystopia

The solution is simple: demand that initiatives like Neuralink be open source. Insist on transparency. Refuse to accept a future where the interface between your mind and the world is owned by a monopoly of corporations that serve the WEF agenda to reduce world population over time (another article on that in the future).

History teaches us that technologies designed to “liberate” often become tools of control. Neuralink’s CONVOY Study is no different—unless we fight for its democratization. Let the brain remain free, entrepreneurial with values, unchained by corporate greed.